Chip 1998 September/CHIP Eylül 1998.iso/Slackwar/docs/mini/Bridge+Firewall

Text File | 1997-12-28 | 20KB | 521 lines

  Linux Bridge+Firewall Mini-HOWTO version 1.2.0
  Peter Breuer ([e-mail])
  Dec. 19 1997

  1.  Introduction

  You should look at the original Bridging mini-HOWTO
  <ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/mini/Bridge> by Chris Cole
  for a different perspective on this.  He is [e-mail].
  The version of his HOWTO that I have based this document on
  (alternatively, ripped off) is 1.03 dated Aug 23 1996.

  2.  What and Why (and How?)

  2.1.  What

  A bridge is an intelligent connecting wire betwen two network cards.
  A firewall is an intelligent insulator.

  2.2.  Why

  You might want a bridge if you have several computers:

  1. to save the price of a new hub when you just happen to have an
     extra ethernet card available.

  2. to save the bother of learning how to do IP-forwarding and other
     tricks when you _have_ two cards in your computer.

  3. to avoid maintenance work in the future when things change around!

  ``Several computers'' might be as few as three if those are routing or
  bridging or just moving around the room from time to time! You also
  might want a bridge just for the fun of finding out what it does.
  ``2'' was what I wanted a bridge for.

  If you are really interested in ``1'', you have to be one of the very
  few.  Check the NET-2-HOWTO
  <ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/NET-2-HOWTO> and the
  Serial-HOWTO <ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/Serial-HOWTO>
  for better tricks.

  You want a firewall if

  1. you are trying to protect your network from external accesses, or

  2. you are trying to deny access to the world outside from your
     network.

  Curiously, I needed ``2'' here too.  Policy at my university presently
  is that we should not act as internet service providers to
  undergraduates.

  2.3.  How?

  I started out bridging the network cards in a firewalling machine and
  ended up firewalling without having cut the bridge. It seems to work
  and is more flexible than either configuration alone. I can take down
  the firewall and keep bridging or take down the bridge when I want to
  be more circumspect.

  I would guess that the bridge code lives just above the physical
  device layer and the firewalling code lives one layer higher up, so
  that the bridging and firewalling configurations effectively act as
  though they are running connected together ``in sequence'' and not
  ``in parallel'' (ouch!). Diagram:

       -> Bridge-in -> Firewall-in -> Kernel -> Firewall-out -> Bridge-out ->

  There is no other way to explain how one machine can be a
  ``conductor'' and an ``insulator'' at the same time.  There are a few
  caveats but I'll come to those later.  Basically you must route
  packets that you want to firewall.  Anyway, it all seems to work
  together nicely for me.  Here is what you do ...

  3.  BRIDGING

  3.1.  Software

  Get the bridge configuration utility
  <ftp://shadow.cabi.net/pub/Linux/BRCFG.tgz> from Alan Cox's home
  pages. This is the same reference as in Chris' document. I just didn't
  realize that it was an ftp and not an http URL ...

  3.2.  Prior Reading.

  Read the Multiple Ethernet HOWTO
  <ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/mini/Multiple-Ethernet>
  for some advice on getting more than one network card recognized and
  configured.

  Yet more details of the kind of boot magic that you may need are in
  the Boot Prompt HOWTO
  <ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/BootPrompt-HOWTO>.

  You may be able to get away without the NET-2 HOWTO
  <ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/NET-2-HOWTO>. It is a good
  long read and you will have to pick from it the details you need.

  3.3.  Boot configuration

  The reading material above will tell you that you need to prepare the
  kernel to recognize a second ethernet device at boot up by adding this
  to your /etc/lilo.conf, and then re-run lilo:

       append = 'ether=0,0,eth1'

  Note the 'eth1'. 'eth0' is the first card. 'eth1' is the second card.
  You can always add the boot parameters in your response to the line
  that lilo offers you. This is for three cards:

       linux ether=0,0,eth1 ether=0,0,eth2

  I use loadlin to boot my kernel from DOS:

       loadlin.exe c:\vmlinuz root=/dev/hda3 ro ether=0,0,eth1 ether=0,0,eth2

  Note that this trick makes the kernel probe at bootup. That will not
  happen if you load the ethernet drivers as modules (for safety since
  the probe order can't be determined) so if you use modules you will
  have to add the appropriate IRQ and port parameters for the driver in
  your /etc/conf.modules.  I have at least

       alias eth0 3c509
       alias eth1 de620
       options 3c509 irq=5 io=0x210
       options de620 irq=7 bnc=1

  You can tell if you use modules by using ``ps -aux'' to see if kerneld
  is running and checking that there are .o files in a subdirectory of
  your /lib/modules directory. You want the directory named with what
  uname -r tells you. If you have kerneld and/or you have a foo.o then
  edit /etc/conf.modules and read the man page for depmod carefully.

  Note also that until recently (kernel 2.0.25) the 3c509 driver could
  not be used for more than one card if used as a module. I have seen a
  patch floating around that fixes the oversight. It may be in the
  kernel when you read this.

  3.4.  Kernel configuration

  Recompile the kernel with bridging enabled.

  CONFIG_BRIDGE=y

  I also compiled with firewalling and IP-forwarding and -masquerading
  and the rest enabled. Only if you want firewalling too ...

       CONFIG_FIREWALL=y
       CONFIG_NET_ALIAS=y
       CONFIG_INET=y
       CONFIG_IP_FORWARD=y
       CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y
       CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL=y
       CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL_VERBOSE=y
       CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE=y

  You don't need all of this. What you do need apart from this is the
  standard net configuration:

       CONFIG_NET=y

  and I do not think you need worry about any of the other networking
  options. I have any options that I did not actually compile into the
  kernel available through kernel modules that I can add in later.

  Install the new kernel in place, rerun lilo and reboot with the new
  kernel. Nothing should have changed at this point!

  3.5.  Network addresses

  Chris says that a bridge should not have an IP address but that is not
  the setup to be described here.

  You are going to want to use the machine for connecting to the net so
  you need an address and you need to make sure that you have the
  loopback device configured in the normal way so that your software can
  talk to the places they expect to be able to talk to. If loopback is
  down the name resolver or other net sevices might fail. See the
  NET-2-HOWTO, but your standard configuration should already have done
  this bit:

       ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 route add -net 127.0.0.0

  You will have to give addresses to your network cards. I altered the
  /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 file in my slackware (3.x) to setup two cards and
  you should also essentially just look for your net configuration file
  and double or treble the number of instructions in it.  Suppose that
  you already have an address at

       192.168.2.100

  (that is in the private net reserved address space, but never mind -
  it won't hurt anybody if you use this address by mistake) then you
  probably already have a line like

       ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 metric 1

  in your configuration. The first thing you are going to probably want
  to do is cut the address space reached by this card in half so that
  you can eventually bridge or firewall the two halves.  So add a line
  which reduces the mask to address a smaller number of machines:

       ifconfig eth0 netmask 255.255.255.128

  Try it too. That restricts the card to at most the address space
  between

  Now you can set your second card up in the other half of the local
  address space. Make sure that nobody already has the address. For
  symmetry I set it at 228=128+100 here. Any address will do so long as
  it is not in the other card's mask, and even then, well, maybe. Avoid
  special addresses like .0, .1, .128 etc. unless you really know what
  you are doing.

       ifconfig eth1 192.168.2.228 netmask 255.255.255.128 metric 1

  That restricts the second card to addresses between .128 and .255.

  3.6.  Network routing

  This is where I have to announce the caveats in the bridging +
  firewalling scheme: you cannot firewall packets which are not routed.
  No routes, no firewall. At least this appears to be true in the 2.0.30
  and more recent kernels. The firewalling filters are closely involved
  with the ip-forwarding code.

  That does not mean that you cannot bridge. You can bridge between two
  cards and firewall them from a third. You can have only two cards and
  firewall both of them against an outside IP such as a nearby router,
  provided that the router is routed by you to exactly one of the cards.

  In other words, since I will be doing firewalling, so I want to
  precisely control the physical destination of some packets.

  I have the small net of machines attached to a hub hanging off eth0,
  so I configure a net there:

       route add -net 192.168.2.128 netmask 255.255.255.128 dev eth0

  The 128 would be 0 if I had a full class C network there.  I don't, by
  definition, since I just halved the address space.  The 'dev eth0' is
  not necessary here because the cards address falls within the mask,
  but it may be necessary for you.  One might need more than one card
  holding up this subnet (127 machines on one segment, oh yeah) but
  those cards would be being bridged under the same netmask so that they
  appear as one to the routing code.

  On the other card I have a line going straight through to a big router
  that I trust.

                                               client 129
           __                                        |    __
  client 1   \    .0                    .128         |   /   net 1
  client 2 --- Hub - eth0 - Kernel - eth1 - Hub - Router --- net 2
  client 3 __/       .100            .228         .2 |   \__ net 3
                                                     |
                                               client 254

  I attach the address of the router to that card as a fixed ('static')
  route because it would otherwise fall within the first cards netmask
  and the kernel would be thinking wrongly about how to send packets to
  the big router. I will want to firewall these packets and that is
  another reason fow wanting to route them specifically.

       route add 192.168.2.2 dev eth1

  I don't need it, since I don't have any more machines in that half of
  the address space, but I declare a net also on the second card.
  Separating my interfaces into two sets via routing will allow me to do
  very tight firewalling eventually , but you can get away with far less
  routing than this.

       route add -net 192.168.2.128 netmask 255.255.255.128 dev eth1

  I also need to send all non-local packets out to the world so I tell
  the kernel to send them to the big router

       route add default gw 192.168.2.2

  3.7.  Card configuration

  So much was standard networking setup, but we are bridging so we also
  have to listen on both (?) cards for packets that are not aimed at us.
  The following should go into the network configuration file.

       ifconfig promisc eth0 ifconfig promisc eth1

  The man page says allmulti=promisc, but it didn't work for me.

  3.8.  Additional routing

  One thing that I noticed was that I had to put at least the second
  card into a mode where it would respond to the big router's questions
  about which machines I was hiding in my local net.

       ifconfig arp eth1

  For good measure I did this to the other card too.

       ifconfig arp eth0.

  3.9.  Bridge Configuration

  Put bridging enabling on and into your configuration file:

       brcfg -enable

  You should have been trying this out in real time all along, of
  course!  The bridge configure will bring up some numbers. You can
  experiment with turning on and off the ports one at a time

       brcfg -port 0 -disable/-enable
        brcfg -port 1 -disable/-enable

  You get status reports anytime by just running

       brcfg

  without any parameters. You will see that the bridge listens,learns,
  and then does forwarding. (I don't understand why the code repeats the
  same hardware addresses for both my cards, but never mind .. Chris'
  howto say that is OK)

  3.10.  Try it out

  If you are still up and running as things are, try out your
  configuration script for real by taking down both cards and then
  executing it:

       ifconfig eth0 down ifconfig eth1 down /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1

  With any luck the various subsystems (nfs, ypbind, etc.)  won't
  notice. Do not try this unless you are sitting at the keyboard!

  If you want to be more careful than this, you should take down as many
  daemons as possible beforehand, and unmount nfs directories. The worst
  that can happen is that you have to reboot in single-user mode (the
  'single' parameter to lilo or loadlin), and take out your changes
  before rebooting with things the way they were before you started.

  3.11.  Checks

  Verify that there is different traffic on each interface:

       tcpdump -i eth0

       tcpdump -i eth1

  You should get used to using tcpdump to look for things that should
  not be happening or that are happening and should not.

  For instance look for packets that have gone through the bridge to the
  second card from the internal net. Here I am looking for packets from
  the machine with address .22:

       tcpdump -i eth1 -e host 192.168.2.22

  Then send a ping from the .22 host to the router. You should see the
  packet reported by tcpdump.

  At this stage you should have a bridge ready that also has two network
  addreses.  Test that you can ping them from outside and inside your
  local net, and that you can telnet and ftp around between inside and
  outside too.

  4.  FIREWALLING

  4.1.  Software and reading

  You should read the Firewall-HOWTO
  <ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/Firewall-HOWTO>.

  That will tell you where to get ipfwadm if you don't already have it.
  There are other tools you can get but I made no progress until I tried
  ipfwadm. It is nice and low level! You can see exactly what it is
  doing.

  4.2.  Preliminary checks

  You have compiled IP-forwarding and masquerading into the kernel so
  you will want to check that the firewall is in its default (accepting)
  state with

       ipfwadm -I -l ipfwadm -O -l ipfwadm -F -l

  That is respectively, 'display the rules affecting the ..'  incoming
  or outgoing or forwarding (masquerading) '.. sides of the firewall'.
  The '-l' means 'list'.

  You might have compiled in accounting too:

       ipfwadm -A -l

  You should see that there are no rules defined and that the default is
  to accept every packet. You can get back to this working state anytime
  with

       ipfwadm -I -f
       ipfwadm -O -f
       ipfwadm -F -f

  The '-f' means 'flush'. You may need to use that.

  4.3.  Default rule

  I want to cut the world off from my internal net and do nothing else,
  so I will want to give as a last (default) rule that the firewall
  should ignore any packets coming in from the internal net and directed
  to outside.  I put all the rules (in this order) into
  /etc/rc.d/rc.firewall and execute it from /etc/rc.d/rc.local at
  bootup.

       ipfwadm -I -a reject -S 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.128 -D 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0

  The '-S' is the source address/mask. The '-D' is the destination
  address/mask.

  This format to is rather long-winded. Ipfwadm is intelligent about
  network names and some common abbreviations. Check the man pages.

  It is possibly more convenient to put some or all of these rules on
  the outgoing half of the firewall by using '-O' instead of '-I', but
  I'll state the rules here all formulated for the incoming half.

  4.4.  Holes per address

  Before that default rule, I have to place some rules that serve as
  exceptions to this general denial of external services to internal
  clients.

  I want to treat the firewall machines address on the internal net
  specially.  I will stop people logging in to the firewall machine
  unless they have special permission, but once they are there they
  should be allowed to talk to the world.

       ipfwadm -I -i accept -S 192.168.2.100/255.255.255.255 \
        -D 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0

  I also want the internal clients to be able to talk to the firewalling
  machine. Maybe they can persuade it to let them get out!

       ipfwadm -I -i accept -S 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.128 \
        -D 192.168.2.100/255.255.255.255

  Check at this point that you can get in to the clients from outside
  the firewall via telnet, but that you cannot get out. That should mean
  that you can just about make first contact, but the clients cannot
  send you any prompts. You should be able to get all the way in if you
  use the firewall machine as a staging post. Try rlogin and ping too,
  with tcpdump running on one card or the other. You should be able to
  make sense of what you see.

  4.5.  Holes per protocol

  I went on to relax the rules protocol by protocol. I want to allow
  pings from the outside to the inside to get an echo back, for
  instance, so I inserted the rule:

       ipfwadm -I -i accept -P icmp -S 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.128 \
        -D 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0

  The '-P icmp' works the protocol-specific magic.

  Until I get hold of an ftp proxy I am also allowing ftp calls out with
  port-specific relaxations. This targets ports 20 21 and 115 on outside
  machines.

       ipfwadm -I -i accept -P tcp -S 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.128 \
        -D 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 20 21 115

  I could not make sendmail between the local clients work without a
  nameserver. Rather than set up a nameserver right then on the
  firewall, I just lifted the firewall for tcp domain service queries
  precisely aimed at the nearest existing nameserver and put its address
  in the clients /etc/resolv.conf ('nameserver 123.456.789.31' on a
  separate line).

       ipfwadm -I -i accept -P tcp -S 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.128 \
        -D 123.456.789.31/255.255.255.255 54

  You can find which port number and protocol a service requires with
  tcpdump. Trigger the service with a an ftp or a telnet or whatever to
  or from the internal machine and then watch for it on the input and
  output ports of the firewall with tcpdump:

       tcpdump -i eth1 -e host client04

  for example. The /etc/services file is another important source of
  clues. To let telnet and ftp IN to the firewall from outside, you have
  to allow the local clients to call OUT on a specific port. I
  understand why this is necessary for ftp - it's the server that
  establishes the data stream in the end - but I am not sure why telnet
  also needs this.

       ipfwadm -I -i accept -P tcp -S 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.128 ftp telnet \
        -D 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0

  There is a particular problem with some daemons that look up the
  hostname of the firewalling machine in order to decide what is their
  networking address. Rpc.yppasswdd is the one I had trouble with. It
  insists on broadcasting information that says it is outside the
  firewall (on the second card). That means the clients inside can't
  contact it.

  Rather than start IP aliasing or change the daemon code, I mapped the
  name to the inside card address on the clients in their /etc/hosts.

  4.6.  Checks

  You want to test that you can still telnet, rlogin and ping from the
  outside. From the inside you should be able to ping out. You should
  also be able to telnet to the firewall machine from the inside and the
  latter should be able to do anything.

  That is it. At this point you probably want to learn about rpc/Yellow
  Pages and the interaction with the password file. The firewalled
  network wants to run without its unprivileged users being able to log
  on to the firewall - and thus get out. Some other HOWTO!